August 25, 1985
ENSHRINING THE FUHRER
By GORDON A. CRAIG; GORDON A. CRAIG, THE EMERITUS STERLING PROFESSOR OF
HUMANITIES AT STANFORD UNIVERSITY, IS THE AUTHOR OF ''GERMANY: 1866-1945''
AND ''THE GERMANS.''
HITLER - MEMOIRS OF A CONFIDANT Edited by Henry Ashby Turner Jr. Translated
by Ruth Hein. Illustrated. 333 pp. New Haven: Yale University Press. $29.95.
IN the funeral chapter of ''Ulysses,'' one of Joyce's characters tells
the story of two drunks who are looking for the final resting place of a
friend of theirs, Terence Mulcahy from the Coombe. They finally find it, and
as one of them spells out the name, the other squints blearily up at the
statue of the Saviour that their friend's widow has had erected over the
grave. ''Not a bloody bit like the man,'' he says. ''That's not Mulcahy,
whoever done it.''
This story comes powerfully to mind as one reads this record of
conversations between Adolf Hitler and Otto Wagener in the years from 1929
to 1933, for the Fuhrer who emerges from ''Hitler - Memoirs of a Confidant''
is not the one whom we know from his own writings, accounts by other
associates and his lurid career of crimes against peace and civilization.
What is one to make of this new Hitler, who talks mawkishly and interminably
about Christian virtues and defines his goal as the ''fulfillment of the
sublime Christian idea of a socialist sense of community''? Far from wishing
to exterminate the Jews, this Hitler insists, ''Like Christ, we must preach,
'You are all brothers! Love one another!' . . . We must not call one blood
worse than another.''
He is so opposed to conflict that he is reluctant to arm his storm troops
(SA) against their domestic opponents and agrees with Wagener that the time
for large-scale international conflict is definitely past. This Hitler
''lived in an intellectual universe that differed from what we are
accustomed to, [so] his conclusions, his utterances - yes, even his
instructions . . . - could, in the hands of those who had to execute them,
lead to consequences he neither intended nor foresaw.'' Faced with this
image of Hitler, as an ''unwitting prisoner'' of Goring, Goebbels and
Himmler, powerless to prevent his true intentions from being distorted by
evil associates for their own criminal purposes, we have every reason to
say, ''Not a bloody bit like the man.''
It would be unwise, however, to reject these memoirs out of hand simply
because their author was so convinced the Fuhrer was ''a phenomenon that had
. . . somehow [been] set by providence in the human world'' that he resolved
to fashion a literary shrine to his memory. For this book, now translated by
Ruth Hein, is not only or always bent on palliating Hitler's crimes, and
when it is not, it is informative and often fascinating. Historians are not
oversupplied with source materials on the years immediately before Hitler's
accession to power in 1933, and despite its weaknesses, this record tells us
a good deal we did not know about currents of thought, unresolved issues and
conflicts of personality within the Nazi party during these critical years.
Nor is there any doubt about the competence of its author to speak about
these things. Otto Wagener was a veteran of World War I, in which he served
in the General Staff. After 1918, as a member of a volunteer Free Corps, he
fought against the Bolsheviks in the Baltic lands and the Poles in Upper
Silesia, and in 1920 he was involved in the unsuccessful Kapp putsch against
the Weimar Republic and served a short term in prison. Throughout the 20's
he continued to be active in rightist politics but also studied economics
and became a successful businessman and a member of various trade
associations, with a wide acquaintance in political, military and even
academic circles. In the summer of 1929, he received an invitation to attend
the National Socialist party congress in Nuremberg and was subsequently
asked by Hitler to become chief of staff of the SA. From then until the
beginning of 1933, he was a member of the Fuhrer's inner circle. Contact
with Hitler was broken off abruptly in June 1933, and Wagener retired to
pri-vate life until 1939, when he returned to the army as a captain. He had
risen to the rank major general by the time he surrendered to the British on
Rhodes in 1945, and he wrote his book in captivity. During 1931 and 1932, as
SA chief of staff and head of the Nazi party's Economic Policy Section,
Wagener was together with Hitler hundreds of times, for they both had
offices in the party's headquarters, the Brown House in Munich, and Wagener
accompanied Hitler on his frequent trips by car to various parts of Germany.
The conversations he records cannot be taken as verbatim, since they were
written down 14 years later. But they have value because they tell us what
was on Hitler's mind in those years and what issues the party leaders were
debating. T HEY make clear, for example, that, while Hitler never doubted he
was going to achieve his goal of becoming Chancellor of Germany, he was not
yet sure what he would do then. This was certainly true for economic policy,
about which party debate became increasingly intense in 1931 and 1932, with
Wagener trying to persuade Hitler to abandon economic liberalism and follow
a socialist-corporatist line. It was also true of military policy, with
Ernst Roehm, Wagener's successor as SA chief, arguing that he should be
permitted to take over the Reichswehr and turn it into a revolutionary army.
Both Wagener and Roehm lost their battles, but that outcome was not clear at
the time of these conversations, and Wagener's mem-oir is doubly interesting
because it reveals Hitler's noncommittal attitude; we get the sense that he
is constantly weighing issues, not on their own merits but from a cold,
pragmatic political point of view.
Of equal interest are the long conversations on for-eign policy, which
show how firmly Hitler believed at that time in the necessity of gaining an
alliance with Great Britain, even at the cost of forswearing colonies, and
how muddled his views were about the United States. Notable also are the
sometimes disjointed discussions about education and the tasks of German
youth, about modern painting, about art and propaganda, as well as about
party politics in the Weimar Republic. Finally, scattered through these
pages is a fair amount of new information about Hitler's relations with
women, particularly his niece Geli Raubal and Joseph Goebbels' wife, Magda,
his views on homosexuality, his use of drugs and stimulants, his extensive
reading and the bizarre social behavior of some of his associates.
All in all, then, there is little doubt that these memoirs are a rich
treasury of information about Hitler and his party. But, as Henry Ashby
Turner Jr., the Yale historian who is the editor of this volume, says in his
penetrating introductory assessment of their historical importance, they
should be read with a wary regard for the circumstances in which they were
written and the biases of their author.
----------------------------------------------------------------
December 24, 1996
Good
Morning from the Zundelsite:
All day yesterday, I thought about what I might put beneath your Christmas
tree, and this morning I decided that it had to be a little bit more sanity,
truth, clarity and vision.
So here it is, from conversations recorded by Otto Wagener in "Hitler: Memoirs
of a Confidant" - and, all the more remarkable! - published by Yale University
Press in 1985:
Here are the Fuehrer's words, prior to World War II:
"Much as I gaze in awe at the Jews' laws for maintaining and
preserving the purity of their race, I must nevertheless proceed from my
belief that racial theories, should they become the subject of public
discussion, may prove a national disaster rather than a blessing.
We must accept the mixing of blood as it is. We must not call one blood worse
than another, one mixture better than another. Rather, we must employ other
means to breed a higher form from this gray mass. We must try to bring to the
surface the valuable traits of the people. . . to cultivate and to develop
them, and we must find ways and means to prevent the propagation of all the
bad, inferior, criminal and decadent tendencies and all the congenital
diseases so damaging to the Volk.
Furthermore, we must educate the young people in the beauty of movement, the
beauty of the body, and the beauty of the spirit. Athletics, personal
grooming, physical training, public performances of competitive games and
contests, and a revival of the performing arts along the old Greek models will
contribute to making a girl see how the man who is worthy of her should look
and appear, as well as letting a boy know what his ideal woman is like. Then
he will voluntarily turn away from the games coquettish puppets play, from
dyed hair, painted faces, roughed lips and red fingernails.
And such selective breeding will become all the more matter of course the more
we bring the . . . Volk together and weld it into one. In their earliest
childhood, in kindergarten, in elementary school, in the Hitler Youth and the
League of German girls, all classes must meet. No distinction should be
allowed to be made between the rich and the poor, between high and low,
between city and country, between employer and employee; rather, there is only
the distinction between respectable and disrespectable, between companionable
and uncompanionable, between aboveboard and furtive, between truth and lies,
between courage and cowardice, and between health and sickness.
Then, when these children grow up, they will use their feet to cast aside all
this party rubbish, and in every district they will elect the man, the only
one, who represents them and goes to the Reichstag on their behalf. Only then
will we see true democracy! And it is ridiculous to think that among these
elected candidates there would be even a single one who is not a genuine
paragon . . . representative, in short, of (the) Volk that from generation to
generation rises ever higher from the oozing slime in which Europe, in which
the Old World is still wading.
Sometimes I have the feeling that it is not granted us to experience this
great future, that only a coming generation will be mature enough to translate
our ideas and plans into action. But it is our mission to bring about the
basis for such a community of the Volk, and especially to guide the young
people . . . along the paths that lead to this goal. It will not come about
without a struggle! We must make no mistake about that. Not everything we
tackle will be successful. There will be setbacks. . . Hammer blows will rain
down upon us. But under them and through them the iron and bronze of which the
. . . Volk is fashioned will be pounded and forged, and it will grow hard,
hard as steel, steely! That is the way to make that magnificent sword with its
bluish gleam that nevermore breaks and nevermore misses its mark . . . "
Have yourself a quiet and reflective Christmas Eve and a wholesome Christmas
1996!
Ingrid
Thought for the Day:
"It is of great consequence in what bodies souls are placed, for many things
spring from the body that sharpen the mind, and many that blunt and dull it."
(Cicero
 |
Institute for Historical Review
|
 |
Historical News and Comment
Rauschning's Phony 'Conversations With Hitler': An Update
Mark Weber
One of the most widely quoted sources of information about Hitler's
personality and secret intentions is the supposed memoir of Hermann
Rauschning, the National Socialist President of the Danzig Senate in
1933-1934 who was ousted from the Hitler movement a short time later and
then made a new life for himself as a professional anti-Nazi.
In the book known in German as Conversations with Hitler (Gespraeche
mit Hitler) and first published in the U.S. in 1940 as The Voice of
Destruction, Rauschning presents page after page of what are purported
to be Hitler's most intimate views and plans for the future, allegedly
based on dozens of private conversations between 1932 and 1934. After the
war the memoir was introduced as Allied prosecution exhibit USSR-378 at
the main Nuremberg "war crimes" trial.
Among the damning quotations attributed to Hitler by Rauschning are
these memorable statements:
We must be brutal. We must regain a clear conscience about brutality.
Only then can we drive out the tenderness from our people ... Do I
propose to exterminate entire nationalities? Yes, it will add up to that
... I naturally have the right to destroy millions of men of inferior
races who increase like vermin ... Yes, we are barbarians. We want to be
barbarians. It is an honorable title.
Hitler is also supposed to have confided to Rauschning, an almost
unknown provincial official, fantastic plans for a German world empire
that would include Africa, South America, Mexico and, eventually, the
United States.
Many prestigious historians, inculding Leon Poliakov, Gerhard Weinberg,
Alan Bullock, Joachim Fest, Nora Levin and Robert Payne, used choice
quotations from Rauschning's memoir in their works of history. Poliakov,
one of the most prominent Holocaust writers, specifically praised
Rauschning for his "exceptional accuracy, while Levin, another widely-read
Holocaust historian, called him "one of the most penetrating analysts of
the Nazi period."
But not everyone has been so credulous. Swiss historian Wolfgang Haenel
spent five years diligently investigating the memoir before announcing his
findings in 1983 at a revisionist history conference in West Germany. The
renowned Conversations with Hitler, he declared are a total fraud.
The book has no value "except as a document of Allied war propaganda."
Haenel was able to conclusively establish that Rausching's claim to
have met with Hitler "more than a hundred times is a lie. The two actually
met only four times, and never alone. The words attributed to Hitler, he
showed, were simply invented or lifted from many different sources,
including writings by Juenger and Friedrich Nietzsche. An account of
Hitler hearing voices, waking at night with convulsive shrieks and
pointing in terror at an empty corner while shouting "There, there, in the
corner!" was taken from a short story by French writer Guy de Maupassant.
The phony memoir was designed to incite public opinion in democratic
countries, especially in the United States, in favor of war against
Germany. The project was the brainchild of the Hungarian-born journalist
Emery Reves, who ran an influential anti-German press and propaganda
agency in Paris during the 1930s. Haenel has also found evidence that a
prominent British journalist named Henry Wickham-Steele helped to produce
the memoir. Wickham-Steele was a right-hand man of Sir Robert Vansittart,
perhaps the most vehemently anti-German figure in Britain.
A report about Haenel's sensational findings appeared in the Fall 1983
issue of The Journal of Historical Review. More recently, West
Germany's most influential weekly periodicals, Die Zeit, and Der
Spiegel (7 September 1985), have run lengthy articles about historical
hoax. Der Spiegel concluded that Rauschning's Conversations with
Hitler "are a falsification, an historical distortion from the first to
the last page ... Haenel not only proves the falsification, he also shows
how the impressive surrogate was quickly compiled and which ingredients
were mixed together."
There are some valuable lessons to be learned from the story of this
sordid hoax, which took more than 40 years to finally unmask: It shows
that even the most brazen historical fraud can have a tremendous impact if
it serves important interests, that it's easier to invent a great
historical lie than to expose one and finally, that everyone should be
extremely wary of even the "authoritative" portrayals of the
emotionally-charged Hitler era.
A footnote: Readers interested in an authentic record of Hitler's
personality and private views should look into the fascinating and
wide-ranging memoir of Otto Wagener, published in August 1985 by Yale
University Press under the title Hitler: Memoirs of a Confidant.
Wagener was the first Chief of Staff of the SA ("stormtroopers") and
Director of the Economic-Political Department of the National Socialist
Party. He spent hundreds of hours with Hitler between 1929 and 1932, many
of them alone.
|
Bibliographic information
|
Author:
|
Mark Weber |
|
Title:
|
Rauschning's Phony 'Conversations With Hitler': An Update |
|
Source:
|
The Journal for Historical Review (http://www.ihr.org) |
|
Date:
|
Winter 1985-6 |
|
Issue:
|
Volume 6 number 4 |
|
Location:
|
p. 499 |
|
ISSN:
|
0195-6752 |
|
Attribution:
|
"Reprinted from The Journal of Historical Review, PO Box
2739, Newport Beach, CA 92659, USA. Domestic subscriptions $40 per
year; foreign subscriptions $60 per year." |
|
Please send a copy of all reprints to the Editor.
|
|
|